Retractorless interhemispheric transtentorial approach for large lesions in the posterior incisural space
Category:
Article Type:
Miguel Angel Lopez-Gonzalez, Andrew Jaeger, Brett Kaplan, Timothy Marc Eastin, Lydia Kore, Vadim Gospodarev, Puja D. Patel, Fransua SharafeddinArticle Type:
- Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda,
- Department of Basic Science, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda,
- Department of General Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda,
- Department of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda,
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
- Center for Neurosciences Research, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda,
Miguel Angel Lopez-Gonzalez
Center for Neurosciences Research, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda,
DOI:10.25259/SNI-117-2019
Copyright: © 2019 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to cite this article: Miguel Angel Lopez-Gonzalez, Andrew Jaeger, Brett Kaplan, Timothy Marc Eastin, Lydia Kore, Vadim Gospodarev, Puja D. Patel, Fransua Sharafeddin. Retractorless interhemispheric transtentorial approach for large lesions in the posterior incisural space. 28-Jun-2019;10:130
How to cite this URL: Miguel Angel Lopez-Gonzalez, Andrew Jaeger, Brett Kaplan, Timothy Marc Eastin, Lydia Kore, Vadim Gospodarev, Puja D. Patel, Fransua Sharafeddin. Retractorless interhemispheric transtentorial approach for large lesions in the posterior incisural space. 28-Jun-2019;10:130. Available from: http://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/9440/
Abstract
Case Description: We present four cases of lesions in the posterior incisural space that was treated with a retractorless interhemispheric transtentorial approach. Two patients were previously seen at another institution for a falcotentorial meningioma. We resected the meningiomas with a parietal-occipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach with no neurological deficits. A third patient presented with a large superior vermian hemangioblastoma with a steep angle of the tentorium. The fourth patient had a large upper vermian metastatic lesion with progressive enlargement, which was refractory to radiation treatments and chemotherapy, and we achieved partial resection. Postoperative visual function was completely preserved in all patients.
Conclusion: A carefully executed retractorless interhemispheric approach in select cases is an effective option to reduce morbidity and prevent visual complications when removing lesions in the posterior tentorial incisure.
Keywords: Falcotentorial, Hemangioblastoma, Interhemispheric, Meningioma, Retractorless
INTRODUCTION
CASE REPORTS
Patient 1
A 62-year-old female with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and cerebrovascular accident was followed at another institution for several years with a gradually enlarging falcotentorial lesion. The patient presented to our emergency room with intensifying occipital headaches that were throbbing and pressurized in nature along with worsening balance and gait difficulties. On physical exam, the patient had residual stroke deficits with left upper extremity weakness, right central face palsy, left dysmetria, and worsening gait imbalance. Preoperative imaging showed a 3.6 cm × 3.5 cm × 3 cm enhancing lesion in the posterior incisural space with severe brainstem compression [ Figure 1a - c ].Figure 1:
Magnetic resonance images for patient 1. (a) Preoperative postcontrast T1 sagittal, avidly enhancing mass measuring 3.6 cm anterior-posterior (white arrow) along the tentorium, compressing the aqueduct of Sylvius. Tentorial angle is excessively steep (black arrow), which prohibits an infratentorial approach. (b) Preoperative postcontrast T1 coronal, redemonstration of hyperintense mass measuring 3 cm transverse (white arrow). (c) Preoperative postcontrast T1 axial, hyperintense mass measuring 3.5 cm cranial-caudal (white arrow). (d) Postoperative postcontrast T1 sagittal, postsurgical changes demonstrating gross total resection of pineal region mass (white arrow). (e) Postoperative postcontrast T1 coronal, postsurgical changes demonstrating gross total resection of pineal region mass (white arrow). (f) Postoperative postcontrast T1 axial, postsurgical changes demonstrating gross total resection of pineal region mass (white arrow).For stage one, the patient was placed in a lateral position with their left side facing down and the sagittal plane parallel to the floor. Gravity served to retract the parietal-occipital lobe [ Figure 2 ]. An L-shaped incision was made, with the short arm of the L across the midline and the long arm positioned inferiorly for 7 cm, reaching below the torcula and transverse sinus level to allow adequate blood supply to the flap. After scalp flap retraction, the bone flap was excised as guided by stereotactic navigation. To this end, we created six burr holes, three at each side of the sagittal sinus, with two superior holes 6.5 cm above the torcula level, two inferior holes just above the torcula level, and the last two at mid-distance. The epidural space was dissected toward the left (4.5 cm) and the right side (3 cm). The bone flap was executed 4.5 cm toward the left, and 2.5 cm toward the right of the superior sagittal sinus to allow mobilization of the sinus during deeper interhemispheric dissection. At this point, a left parietal- occipital ventriculostomy was placed, guided by stereotactic navigation, just within the edge of the craniotomy area (6 cm above torcula level and 3 cm left lateral to midline). The dura was opened on the left side in C-fashion with the base toward the superior sagittal sinus, and the ventriculostomy was opened to drain 25 cc of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), allowing brain relaxation. Microsurgical dissection was performed at the interhemispheric fissure using the highest magnification without fixed retractors, covering the parietal- occipital cortex with Telfa patties and only gentle dynamic traction with surgical bipolar and suction. The tentorium was electro-coagulated and opened for approximately 2 cm, with 1 cm lateral and parallel to the straight sinus. The lesion was hypervascular and fibrous and attached to the falx and bilateral tentorium. The capsule of the tumor was localized, electro-coagulated, centrally debulked, and gradually dissected from the inferior sagittal sinus, Vein of Galen, straight sinus, and internal cerebral veins. Approximately 20% of the tumor located toward the right side was not visible. Postoperatively, the patient had baseline neurological conditions and was offered the option for observation, stereotactic radiation treatment, or reoperation for residual lesion. The patient and her family desired complete resection of the residual lesion, and we, therefore, proceeded 2 days later with a contralateral approach using the same technique but with right side facing down and opening the right-sided dura in the same fashion.
Figure 2:
(a) Surgical position keeping sagittal plane parallel to the floor. (b) Craniotomy exposing bilateral dura as well as torcula.Patient 2
A 38-year-old female with no significant medical history presented with severe headaches and nausea that was exacerbated by activities such as bending over and lifting. The patient was previously seen by other neurosurgeons outside of the United States and had undergone an attempted biopsy for a pineal region lesion through a frontal endoscopic approach. This patient developed Parinaud syndrome, diplopia, and gait imbalance which lasted approximately 1 month. Later, they had a second stereotactic biopsy that revealed a WHO Grade 1 meningothelial/fibroblastic meningioma. The patient was neurologically intact by the time of our initial evaluation. Imaging revealed a 3.5 cm × 3.1 cm × 3 cm large pineal region enhancing lesion with brainstem (midbrain in the tectal plate) and cerebellar compression [ Figure 3a - c ].Figure 3:
Magnetic resonance Images for patient 2. (a) Preoperative postcontrast T1 sagittal, homogeneously enhancing ovoid mass centered in the quadrigeminal cistern/pineal region which measures 3.5 cm anterior-posterior (white arrow), compressing the cerebral aqueduct. Tentorial angle is excessively steep (black arrow), which prohibits an infratentorial approach. (b) Preoperative postcontrast T1 coronal, homogeneously enhancing mass measuring 3.1 cm transverse (white arrow). (c) Preoperative postcontrast T1 axial, homogeneously enhancing mass measuring 3 cm cranial-caudal (white arrow). (d) Postoperative postcontrast T1 sagittal, postsurgical changes demonstrating residual tumor capsule (white arrow) attached to segments of the Vein of Galen and internal cerebral vein. (e) Postoperative postcontrast T1 coronal, postsurgical changes demonstrating gross total resection of pineal region mass (white arrow). (f) Postoperative postcontrast T1 axial, postsurgical changes demonstrating residual tumor capsule (white arrow) attached to segments of the Vein of Galen and internal cerebral vein.On discharge, the patient’s baseline symptoms resolved and she was neurologically intact. Pathology confirmed a WHO Grade I fibrous meningioma. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 8 months after surgery revealed the minimal residual presence and no signs of progression [ Figure 3d - f ].
Patient 3
A 65-year-old male with a remote history of scalp melanoma had worsening headaches before admission. He was found to have a 3.2 cm × 2.9 cm × 3.2 cm posterior fossa lesion arising from the inferior surface of the left tentorial leaflet, associated with cerebellar edema, effacement of the fourth ventricle, and mild hydrocephalus [ Figure 4a - c ]. He was operated on initially by another neurosurgeon with a left-sided suboccipital approach, who discovered that the lesion was highly vascular and difficult to access. No neurological deficits were encountered after this operation. A recommendation was made for reoperation with an occipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach, and the patient agreed with the plan for the surgery.Figure 4:
Magnetic resonance images for patient 3. (a) Preoperative postcontrast T1 axial, homogeneously enhancing infratentorial paramedian lesion with high perilesional vascularity (black arrow). (b) Preoperative postcontrast T1 coronal, showing tentorial attachments. (c) Preoperative postcontrast T1 sagittal, showing a homogeneously enhancing mass with perilesional vascularity, and steep tentorial angle. (d) Postoperative (5 months) postcontrast T1 axial, demonstrating minimal tentorial enhancement and vascular clips artifact. (e) Postoperative postcontrast T1 coronal, demonstrating gross total resection and vascular clips artifact. (f) Postoperative noncontrast T1 sagittal, showing postsurgical changes.The patient was neurologically intact and discharged home on postoperative day 5. The pathology report confirmed a WHO Grade I hemangioblastoma, and an immediate postoperative MRI and another at 5 months postsurgery confirmed gross total resection [ Figure 4d - f ].
Patient 4
A 47-year-old female presented with dysmetria and gait imbalance, with a history of metastatic breast cancer that was already managed at another institution with chemotherapy and whole brain radiation treatments for a superior vermian metastasis 3.1 cm × 3.0 cm × 3 cm [ Figure 5a - c ]. Imaging studies showed progressive enlargement of the lesion and were presented at our institutional tumor board conference, recommending surgical debulking.Figure 5:
Magnetic resonance images for patient 4. (a) Preoperative postcontrast T1 axial, showing heterogeneously enhancing superior vermian lesion without hydrocephalus. (b) Preoperative postcontrast T1 coronal. (c) Preoperative postcontrast T1 sagittal, showing a heterogeneously enhancing mass with a displacement of tectal plate and steep tentorial angle. (d) Postoperative postcontrast T1 axial, demonstrating minimal surgical cavity and residual lesion. (e) Postoperative postcontrast T1 coronal, demonstrating partial resection. (f) Postoperative noncontrast T1 sagittal, demonstrating postsurgical changes.Postoperatively, the patient continued to experience dysmetria and gait imbalance. The lumbar drain was removed on postoperative day 2 and she was discharged to a rehabilitation center on postoperative day 13. Pathology reported metastatic adenocarcinoma with prominent necrosis and we are pending to start stereotactic radiation treatment for the residual lesion [ Figure 5d - f ].
DISCUSSION
Falcotentorial meningioma resection approaches
Due to their complex nature and proximity to vital structures, several surgical approaches have been implemented in the treatment of falcotentorial meningiomas, including occipital interhemispheric transtentorial, infratentorial supracerebellar, biparietooccipital craniotomies, and supra/ infratentorial-trans-sinus approaches.[ 1 , 2 , 9 , 12 , 16 ,21 , 24 ] The choice of surgical approach depends primarily on the size and location of the tumor as well as angiographic characteristics.For example, an occipital interhemispheric approach generally preserves the internal cerebral veins, Vein of Galen, and straight sinus.[ 7 ] A posterior interhemispheric retrocallosal transfalcine approach is useful for select superiorly positioned falcotentorial meningiomas, though the Vein of Galen and straight sinus at the falcotentorial junction must be carefully avoided.[ 14 ] The bi-occipital suboccipital transsinus transtentorial approach can be effective for large, deep-seated meningiomas and involves mild retraction of the occipital lobe and cerebellum, resulting in wide supratentorial and infratentorial exposure of extensive pineal region tumors.[ 13 ] Ultimately, the goal of each surgical approach is complete or near complete tumor resection without compromising vital structures.
Visual deficits
Visual deficits are a frequent complication of the various approaches utilizing retractors to resect falcotentorial meningiomas, due to damage to the optic apparatus.[ 3 , 8 , 19 , 23 , 25 , 5 ] A summary of visual outcomes after lesions resection is shown in Table 1 . Together, these studies illustrate the commonality of postoperative visual deficits experienced by falcotentorial meningioma patients after various surgical approaches.Advantages of a retractorless posterior interhemispheric approach
The posterior interhemispheric approach has been used to access lesions in the pineal region, posterior incisural space, posterior region of third ventricle, and adjacent structures.[ 11 , 15 , 17 , 26 ] Distinctively, this approach allows for gravity-assisted occipital lobe retraction,[ 18 ] which can enhance exposure during surgery and reduce morbidity such as visual deficits postoperatively.[ 6 ] Using gravity-assisted occipital lobe retraction, we avoided the use of retractors, which are often used to access the tumor site during current surgical approaches. Prolonged occipital lobe retraction may be a causative factor resulting in postoperative visual deficits,[ 6 , 15 , 18 ] as pressure on the medial occipital lobe from spatula retraction can compromise the vasculature in the calcarine area.[ 3 ] A retractorless approach has been reported to help avoid bilateral cortical blindness due to occipital lobe retraction.[ 4 ] Gravity-assisted retraction was used successfully in this study using strategic patient positioning, which resulted in the positive outcomes of tumor resection and complete preservation of visual function in all patients. It is important to note that partial resection in patient four was not a limitation caused by the retractorless approach, since partial debulking was decided on due to strong attachments of the metastatic lesion to the dorsal midbrain and cerebellar peduncles, and resulted in the stable postoperative neurological exam.CONCLUSION
Authors’ contributions
Ethical approval
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
References
2. Azab WA, Nasim K, Salaheddin W. An overview of the current surgical options for pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol Int. 2014. 5: 39-
3. Bassiouni H, Asgari S, König HJ, Stolke D. Meningiomas of the falcotentorial junction: Selection of the surgical approach according to the tumor type. Surg Neurol. 2008. 69: 339-49
4. Bassiouni H, Hunold A, Asgari S, Stolke D. Tentorial meningiomas: Clinical results in 81 patients treated microsurgically. Neurosurgery. 2004. 55: 108-16
5. Biroli A, Chiocchetta M, Gerosa M, Talacchi A. Surgical treatment of parasagittal and falcine meningiomas of the posterior third. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012. 154: 1987-95
6. Chi JH, Lawton MT. Posterior interhemispheric approach: Surgical technique, application to vascular lesions, and benefits of gravity retraction. Neurosurgery. 2006. 59: ONS41-9
7. Couldwell WT. Left occipital craniotomy for resection of falcotentorial meningioma. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. 43: V9-
8. Goto T, Ohata K, Morino M, Takami T, Tsuyuguchi N, Nishio A. Falcotentorial meningioma: Surgical outcome in 14 patients. J Neurosurg. 2006. 104: 47-53
9. Hernesniemi J, Romani R, Albayrak BS, Lehto H, Dashti R, Ramsey C. Microsurgical management of pineal region lesions: Personal experience with 119 patients. Surg Neurol. 2008. 70: 576-83
10. Hong CK, Hong JB, Park H, Moon JH, Chang JH, Lee KS. Surgical treatment for falcotentorial meningiomas. Yonsei Med J. 2016. 57: 1022-8
11. Ito Z. The microsurgical anterior interhemispheric approach suitably applied to ruptured aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery in the acute stage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1982. 63: 85-99
12. Kennedy BC, Bruce JN. Surgical approaches to the pineal region. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011. 22: 367-80
13. Liu JK. Combined bi-occipital suboccipital transsinus transtentorial approach for resection of a pineal region falcotentorial meningioma: Operative video and technical nuances. Neurosurg Focus. 2016. 40: V14-
14. Liu JK, Cohen MA. Endoscopic-assisted posterior interhemispheric retrocallosal transfalcine approach for microsurgical resection of a pineal region falcotentorial meningioma: Operative video and technical nuances. Neurosurg Focus. 2016. 40: V15-
15. Liyong S, Bao Y, Liang J, Li M, Ren J. Posterior interhemispheric transtentorial approach for resection of a meningioma at the posteromedial tentorial incisura. Neurosurg Focus. 2016. 40: V8-
16. Lopez-Gonzalez MA, Dolan E. Endodermal cyst in pineal region: Rare location. Surg Neurol Int. 2016. 7: S279-81
17. Lu ZF. Resection of suprasellar meningioma through interhemispheric approach. J Craniofac Surg. 2014. 25: 1302-4
18. Nanda A, Patra DP, Savardekar A, Maiti TK, Konar SK, Notarianni C. Tentorial meningiomas: Reappraisal of surgical approaches and their outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2018. 110: e177-e196
19. Nazzaro JM, Shults WT, Neuwelt EA. Neuro-ophthalmological function of patients with pineal region tumors approached transtentorially in the semisitting position. J Neurosurg. 1992. 76: 746-51
20. Nowak A, Dziedzic T, Czernicki T, Kunert P, Marchel A. Falcotentorial and velum interpositum meningiomas: Two distinct entities of the pineal region. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2014. 48: 397-402
21. Oliveira J, Cerejo A, Silva PS, Polónia P, Pereira J, Vaz R. The infratentorial supracerebellar approach in surgery of lesions of the pineal region. Surg Neurol Int. 2013. 4: 154-
22. Ono M, Ono M, Rhoton AL, Barry M. Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the tentorial incisura. J Neurosurg. 1984. 60: 365-99
23. Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Chang EF, Chaichana KL, McDermott MW. Surgical considerations in the management of falcotentorial meningiomas: Advantages of the bilateral occipital transtentorial/transfalcine craniotomy for large tumors. Operative Neurosurgery. 2009. 64: 260-8
24. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Chang EF, McDermott MW. Falcotentorial meningiomas: Clinical, neuroimaging, and surgical features in six patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2003. 14: e11-
25. Raco A, Agrillo A, Ruggeri A, Gagliardi FM, Cantore G. Surgical options in the management of falcotentorial meningiomas: Report of 13 cases. Surg Neurol. 2004. 61: 157-64
26. Terasaka S, Asaoka K, Kobayashi H, Yamaguchi S. Anterior interhemispheric approach for tuberculum sellae meningioma. Neurosurgery. 2011. 68: 84-8
No comments:
Post a Comment