Blog Archive

Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης

Monday, September 5, 2022

P18.11.A Active beam scanning proton therapy for large skull base benign meningiomas: long-term results

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Purpose
To report long-term results of active beam scanning proton therapy (PT) for large skull base benign meningiomas
Material and Methods
Eighty-two patients (pts) with large skull base meningiomas were treated with PT between April 2015 and December 2021. Median age was 62 years (range, 48-82) while KPS ranged between 60 and 100 (median 90); 60 were female (73%), and 22 were male (27%). Thirty-two pts (39%) had histologically proven World Health Organization (WHO) Grade I tumors. In remaining pts diagnosis was based on the typical imaging appearance of benign meningioma. All patients received PT for residual, progressive or non-operable lesions. Newly diagnosed tumors received total dose of 50 GyRBE (RBE: relative biologic effectiveness) while progressing meningiomas 54 GyRBE. All the treatments were delivered at 2 GyRBE per fraction. All pts were treated with active beam scanning PT using 3 fields with single field optimiz ation technique. Treatment planning was based on morphological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast enhancement medium administration. All pts received also 68-Ga-DOTATOC-PET. Gross tumor volume ranged from 21 to 64 cc. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Median follow-up time was 40 months (range, 3-83).
Results
All pts completed the treatment without breaks. Registered acute side effects include grade 1 (19%) and grade 2 (8%) skin erythema, grade 1 (5%) and grade 2 (5%) alopecia, grade 1 (40%) fatigue, grade 1 (5%) and grade 2 (10%) conjunctivitis, grade 1 (10%) pain, grade 1 (5%) blurred vision, grade 1 (10%) headache, and grade 2 (5%) skin hyperpigmentation. One pts (1%) experienced grade 3 pain. There were no further grade 3 or higher acute toxicities. Registered late side effects include grade 1 (2%) and grade 2 (5%) alopecia, grade 1 (21%) fatigue, grade 1 (5%) and grade 2 (5%) headache, grade 1 (6% ) dizziness, grade 1 (3%) blurred vision, grade 1 (3%) and grade 2 (6%) pain, grade 1 (2%) dry eye, and grade 1 (5%) skin hyperpigmentation. Two pts (2%) experienced grade 3 pain. Two further pts (2%) experienced grade 3 optic neuropathy. There were no further grade 3 or higher late toxicities. During follow-up one pts (1%) with cavernous sinus meningioma experienced complete obstruction of intracavernous carotid artery with mild transient symptoms that resolved in few days and brain tissue ischemia detected at MRI (grade 2). Before irradiation this pts already had a meningioma-related near-complete obstruction of the intracavernous carotid artery and received a vascular surgery evaluation. Currently, absolute tumor control is 99%. Moreover, relief of symptoms recorded before irradiation occurred in 40% of pts.
Conclusion
PT is safe and effective treatment for pts with large skull base benign meningiomas.
View on Web

P03.05.A Radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy (RIL) in glioma: unique injury dynamics following proton vs photon beam radiotherapy

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
White matter injury after brain-directed radiotherapy (RT), aka radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy (RIL), is common in brain tumor patients. Differentiation from progressive disease can be challenging. Dosimetric advantages of protons (PRT) over photons (XRT) minimize radiation to healthy brain tissue, potentially limiting radiotoxic sequelae including RIL. We characterized RIL during periods of progression-free survival (PFS) in glioma patients irradiated with either PRT or XRT, hypothesizing that PRT would result in reduced RIL outside of the target field.
Material and Methods
34 patients (19 male; mean age = 40.10y) with grade 2/3 gliomas and a history of partial cranial RT were stratified by RT modality [XRT (n=17) vs PRT (n=17)] and matched on 11 criteria [age, sex, tumor type/location/laterality, mutational status (IDH; 1p19q deletion), concurrent/adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation dose/fractions] for retrospe ctive analysis. RIL development was characterized longitudinally for up to 3 years post-RT via analysis of serial MRI T2/FLAIR sequences. A novel RIL scoring system with embedded Fazekas scale was designed to quantify injury severity at both global (whole brain) and hemispheric levels.
Results
Matched groups did not differ significantly on any demographic or clinical characteristics. Median PFS post-RT was 4.7 (XRT) and 5.1 (PRT) years. The novel RIL scoring system was reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.9). There was a significant increase in global RIL in both XRT [F(3, 57)=8.63, p< .001] and PRT [F(3, 61)=4.69, p< .005] groups over time, relative to baseline (1-month post-RT). A majority [62% (XRT) and 72% (PRT)] developed moderate or severe RIL within 3 years, with the ipsilesional hemisphere more severely affected. Analysis of RIL injury dynamics (i.e., average % change between 1 and 3 years post-RT) at hemispheric level identified radiation modality-specific differences: XRT resulted in greater contralesional hemispheric injury than PRT [F(1, 31)=4.32, p<.05]. This effect was not observed in ipsilesional hemispheres.
Conclusion
RIL is common in glioma patients and quantifiable by characteristic imaging features, including early onset post-RT, greater ipsilesional injury burden, and progression over time. RIL injury dynamics appear to be radiation modality-specific, whereby XRT causes greater delayed injury in the remote, contralesional hemisphere. These findings may reflect dosimetric differences between protons and photons. The impact of such sequelae on cognitive function is subject of current investigation.
View on Web

KS04.6.A Epidemiology of adult meningioma in the Netherlands: a population-based study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
Meningiomas are the most common primary tumours of the central nervous system. As the majority of meningiomas are benign, initial management often consists of observation only. Consequently, estimates on meningioma incidence are generally considered too low, with many registries mainly depending on pathology notifications. With additional notification sources, this study provides more complete population-based estimates on the incidence, prevalence, and prognostic impact of meningioma diagnosis in the Netherlands.
Material and Methods
Data on patients diagnosed with meningioma during 2000-2019 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), which was expanded to the Dutch Brain Tumour Registry (DBTR) for meningiomas as of 2016. In addition to histological confirmations, the NCR/DBTR receives case notifications from hospital administrative registrations on cost reimbursement and outpatient care. In addition, a data linkage was performed with a clinical database maintained by one of the Dutch neuro-oncology centres to evaluate local completeness of the NCR/DBTR. Time trends of the age-adjusted incidence rates were evaluated by calculating the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Relative survival rates were calculated using the Pohar-Perme estimator.
Results
From 2000 to 2019, a total of 22,605 cases of meningioma were registered; 11,423 (50.5%) were histologically confirmed, while 11,182 (49.5%) had a radiological diagnosis. Over time, incidence increased from 4.7 per 100,000 inhabitants (European Standardized Rate, ESR) to 10.7 (EAPC 4.6%, p<0.01); the incidence of radiological diagnosis increased from 1.2 to 6.9 per 100,000 ESR (EAPC 9.6%, p<0.01). Local data completeness was estimated at 98% for histologically confirmed meningiomas and 87% for radiological diagnoses. On the basis of these incidence estimates, the prevalence of meningioma is estimated at 105/100, 000 on January 1st of 2020, with over 17,500 individuals having had a diagnosis of meningioma at that moment. Relative survival rate at 5 years for grade I meningiomas was 94.8% (95%-confidence interval: 94.0%-95.4%), 84.0% (95%CI: 81.0%-86.5%) for grade II meningiomas, and 47.3% (95%CI: 38.2%-55.8%) for grade III meningiomas.
Conclusion
As the incidence estimates in this study may be considered most complete, the results obtained should approximate the true incidence, prevalence, and prognostic impact of meningioma diagnosis in the Netherlands.
View on Web

P11.52.A Peripheral neuropathies after BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors treatment: a pharmacovigilance study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
BRAF (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of BRAF-activated tumours, firstly melanoma. Nevertheless, they are not devoid of adverse events. Sparse reports in the literature suggest the potential occurrence of peripheral neuropathies (PN) under BRAFi/MEKi treatment, but their characteristics remain poorly defined. We aimed to characterize the clinical phenotypes of PN occurring under BRAFi/MEKi treatment using a national pharmacovigilance database.
Material and Methods
We queried the French pharmacovigilance database for all cases of PN toxicity attributed to at least one BRAFi or MEKi compound. Only cases with a least symptoms description and nerve conduction studies (NCS) conclusion were included.
Results
Sixteen cases of PN occurred in 15 patients were identified. All patients had underlying melanoma. Two main phenotypes were seen. Six patients (dabrafenib-tr ametinib, n=3; vemurafenib, n=2; vemurafenib-cobimetinib, n=1) presented a length-dependent axonal polyneuropathy: symptoms were mostly sensory at lower limbs; NCS disclosed an axonal neuropathy; management and outcome were variable. Nine patients (dabrafenib-trametinib, n=5, encorafenib-binimetinib, n=3, and vemurafenib-cobimetinib, n=1) developed a demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: symptoms affected the four limbs and included hypoesthesia, weakness, and ataxia; cranial nerves were involved in four; NCS showed predominantly demyelinating features; most patients received intravenous immunoglobulins (n=6) or glucocorticoids (n=5), but the outcome was variable; one patient was rechallenged with a different BRAFi/MEKi with a rapid relapse.
Conclusion
Patients under treatment with BRAFi/MEKi may develop treatment-induced PN. Two main phenotypes are seen: a symmetric, axonal, length-dependent polyneuropathy, and a demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.
View on Web

P12.13.B Investigating the tumor - immune cell crosstalk inex vivo glioblastoma models

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
Immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic approach to fight cancer by activating the immune system. Multiple immune-based strategies are under development that aim at recruiting or re-activating cellular components of the immune system. While immunotherapies have recently revolutionized cancer therapy, they have shown so far little therapeutic success in glioblastoma patients. To enhance the efficacy of novel strategies, we need to better understand the immunogenic status of glioblastoma cells and their cross-talk with immune cells in different microenvironmental niches.
Material and Methods
We assessed expression of molecules related to antigen processing and presentation as well as immune checkpoints in patient tumor databases as well as in a series of glioblastoma patient-derived organoids, 3D stem-like cultures and adherent cell lines under varying microenvironmental conditions (varying oxygen levels, inflammation ). We further established an allogenic co-culture protocol for glioblastoma organoids with immune cells isolated from HLA matched donor blood, allowing for the functional assessment of the crosstalk between tumor and immune cells.
Results
Analysis of a large cohort of patient tumors and patient-derived glioblastoma preclinical models shows inter-patient heterogeneity at the level of components of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-MHC-II, immune checkpoints. Glioblastoma cells in general express MHC-I machinery, albeit at different levels. MHC-II and immune checkpoints are variably expressed across glioblastoma cells. Different tumor microenvironment conditions, including hypoxia and interferon-γ, impact the expression of immune-related molecules. Upon co-culture, HLA-matched donor-derived T cells integrate well into the core of glioblastoma tumor organoids and display reciprocal crosstalk with tumor cells.
Conclusion
Assessing antigen presentation and immune cell responses at the functional level are key to improve patient-specific responses to immunotherapies. Advanced glioblastoma organoids incorporating the immune compartment appear as clinically-relevant models for ex vivo efficacy studies.
View on Web

P12.10.A Supratentorial glioblastoma with spinal metastasis: a case report with molecular profiling

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
Glioblastoma (GBM) is regarded as an aggressive brain tumor that rarely develops extracranial metastases. Despite well-investigated molecular alterations in GBM, there is a limited understanding of these associated with the metastatic potential of GBM.
Material and Methods
We present a case report of a 43-year-old woman with frontal GBM IDH-wildtype, who underwent gross-total resection followed by chemoradiation. Five months after surgery, the patient was diagnosed with an intraspinal GBM metastasis. Next-generation sequencing analysis of both primary and metastatic GBM tissues was performed using the Illumina TruSight Tumor 170 assay.
Results
The number of single nucleotide variants observed in the metastatic sample was more than 2-times higher. Mutations in TP53, PTEN, and RB1 found in the primary and metastatic tissue samples are indicative of the mesenchymal GBM subtype. Among others, in the metastatic s ample, there were detected two inactivating mutations (Arg1026Ile, Trp1831Ter) in the NF1 gene, two novel NOTCH3 variants of unknown significance predicted to be damaging (Pro1505Thr, Cys1099Tyr), one novel ARID1A variant of unknown significance (Arg1046Ser), and one gene fusion of unknown significance EIF2B5-KIF5B.
Conclusion
Based on the literature evidence, the inactivation of NF1, NOTCH3, and ARID1A could explain, at least in part, the acquired invasiveness and metastatic potential in this particular GBM case.This work was supported by the grant MUNI/A/1408/2021 of the Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, and INTER-EXCELLENCE Programme / INTER-COST project no. LTC20027 of the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic.
View on Web

P11.75.B Survival benefit of radiotherapy and surgery in patients with lung cancer brain metastases with poor prognosis factors

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
Radiotherapy and surgery are the standard treatments for lung cancer brain metastases (BMs). However, limitted studies focused on the treatments for patients with lung cancer BMs with poor prognosis factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of radiotherapy and surgery in patients with lung cancer BMs with poor prognosis factors, providing reference for clinical strategies.
Material and Methods
We analyzed retrospectively 714 patients with lung cancer BMs. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance potential confounders. Analyses of overall survival (OS) and risk factors for OS were assessed by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model.
Results
Age ≥65 years, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≤70, anaplastic large-cell lymphoma kinase (ALK)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type, extracranial metastases, non-surgery and non-radiotherapy le d to poor prognosis. Patients were stratified according to these factors. Radiotherapy and surgery showed no survival benefit in patients with aged ≥65 years or pretreatment KPS score ≤70 before and after PSM. Before PSM, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) improved the OS and predicted good prognosis in patients with ALK/EGFR wild type or extracranial metastases. WBRT also predicted good prognosis in patients with non-surgery. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) improved the OS and predicted good prognosis in patients with ALK/EGFR wild type or non-surgery. WBRT plus SRS improved the OS and predicted good prognosis in patients with extracranial metastases or non-surgery. WBRT plus SRS also predicted good prognosis in patients with ALK/EGFR wild type. Surgery improved the OS and predicted good prognosis in patients with non-radiotherapy. After PSM, SRS improved the OS and predicted good prognosis in patients with non-surgery. WBRT plus SRS improved the OS and predicted good prognosis in patients with non-surgery or extracranial metastases. WBRT plus SRS also predicted good prognosis in patients with ALK/EGFR wild type. Surgery improved the OS of patients with non-radiotherapy. We defined that the treatment would provide significant survival benefit if it both prolonged the OS and predicted good prognosis. Meanwhile, the results after PSM were more convincing than the results before PSM.
Conclusion
Radiotherapy has significant survival benefit in patients with lung cancer BMs with poor prognosis factors, including patients with ALK/EGFR wild type or extracranial metastases or non-surgery. Surgery only has significant survival benefit in patients with non-radiotherapy.
View on Web

P11.74.A Plexiform Neurofibromas prevalence and treatment modalities in a referral comprehensive cancer center

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is the most common tumor predisposition syndrome, with an incidence of 1/3500. Plexiform neurofibromas (PN) are benign tumors that can occur along the nerve sheath throughout the body, with unpredictable growth and with risk of malignant transformation. Symptoms will depend on their size and location, and include pain, deformity and functional impairment. There is a great variability in the PN severity and impact on quality-of-life (QOL). An unknown percentage of NF1 patients may need treatment, either medical and/or surgical.
Objectives
To assess the frequency of PN in a NF1 population followed in a comprehensive cancer center.
Material and Methods
Retrospective study. All patients with NF1 and PN followed in our center, between 31/12/2000 and 31/12/2021.
Results
Of 438 NF1 patients, 185 had PN (42%). 52 NF1 patients with PN were children (≤ 18). The most common sym ptoms were pain in 71 people (38,4%), deformity in 70 (37,8%) and functional impairment in 69 (37,3%). Several patients had a combination of these symptoms. Different treatment modalities were used for PN: medical, surgical or both. In this study, 54 patients (29,1%) were treated with MEK inhibitors (selumetinib), 74 patients (40%) were treated surgically and 12,4% (23) needed a combined approach (medical and surgical treatment).
Conclusion
PN are frequent in NF1 patients. A significant percentage is symptomatic and will require treatment, surgical, medical or both. There is no standard of care for PN NF1. The timing and sequence of medical and surgical treatment is yet to be defined.
View on Web

P11.73.B The diagnostic value of frame-based stereotactic biopsies in the age of precision oncology: A cross-sectional study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
For non-resectable, eloquent, multifocal and deep-seated intracranial lesions, stereotactic frame-based biopsies can deliver a finite amount of tissue for neuropathology studies. With the increasing role of molecular genetics in the diagnostics of intracranial tumors, sufficient tissue for sequencing studies is of paramount importance. This study explored the rate of successful diagnosis after stereotactic frame-based biopsies of intracranial lesions in a high-throughput neurooncology center
Material and Methods
145 consecutive patients undergoing frame-based stereotactic biopsies in 2020 and 2021 at our neurosurgical department were included in this retrospective analysis. Aspects of histological and molecular (methylomics, panel-sequencing) neuropathology analysis in addition to clinical and radiological variables were analyzed. Cases were classified as conclusive, likely-conclusive (sufficient diagnosis with non-s atisfying sequencing information), and inconclusive neuropathological diagnosis.
Results
Of 145 cases analyzed, astrocytic tumors were suspected in n= 94 (67%) of patients. In n= 122 cases (84%), a conclusive diagnosis was possible. For 14 (11%) cases, a likely-conclusive diagnosis was established Diagnoses comprised mainly WHO 4 glioblastomas (56%), WHO 3 gliomas (2%) in addition to WHO 1 and 2 gliomas (n=7, 5%), CNS lymphomas (n=23, 16%), inflammatory diseases (n=10, 7%) and normal or reactive tissue (n=4, 3%). Methylomics were pivotal in providing an integrated diagnosis in 30% of the cases (panel sequencing in 14%). In n= 12 (8%) of the cases further testing was hindered by insufficient tissue sample DNA. Only in 3 out of 12 cases this resulted in a final inconclusive diagnosis.
Conclusion
Although stereotactic frame-based biopsies deliver a limited amount of tissue, they bear an excellent histopathological and molecular genetic diagnostic yield, with rare case s of missing molecular data or rarely insufficient diagnosis. Optimizing the number and representativeness of cell and DNA-rich stereotactic biopsy specimen might enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of precision oncology even further.
View on Web

P02.10.A CRISPR/Cas9 deletion of SOX2 Regulatory Region 2 (SRR2) decreases SOX2 malignant activity in glioblastoma

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
SOX2 is a transcription factor associated with stem cell activity in several tissues. SOX2 expression is elevated in a large proportion of cancers, such as glioblastoma (GB), the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. SOX2 acts as a relevant driver of GB progression and high levels are associated with the population of tumor initiating cells and poor patient outcome. Transcriptional regulation of SOX2 is complex and not fully understood. The SOX2 regulatory region 2 (SRR2) is located downstream of the SOX2 coding region and mediates SOX2 expression by the association of p21CIP1 and p27KIP1 to SRR2. In this study we dissected the role of SRR2 on SOX2 activity in GB.
Material and Methods
We deleted SRR2 (SRR2del) by CRISPR/Cas9 technology in U373 GB cells. We analyzed the expression of SOX2 and performed in vitro functional experiments. We accomplished rescue experiments overexpressing SOX2 in SRR2del cells and we studied the link between SOX2, p21CIP1 and p27KIP1. Finally, we carried out an in vivo carcinogenesis assay by the injection of SRR2del cells in immunodeficient mice.
Results
We report that the deletion of SRR2 in GB cells leads to a reduction of SOX2 expression, which was accompanied with an impairment of cell growth and proliferation as well as with a reduction of self-renewal capacity in vitro. These data reveal that SRR2 is required for SOX2 expression and that its deletion results in impaired tumorigenic capacity of GB cells. These effects correlated with an increased expression of p21CIP1 and p27KIP1 together with high levels of p53 in SRR2del cells. On the contrary, SRR2del cells presented decreased levels of stem cell markers, supporting the idea that SRR2 is necessary for the SOX2-mediated regulation of stemness pathways. Furthermore, ectopic overexpression of SOX2 in SRR2del cells restored SOX2 expression as well as proliferation and stem cell properties, indicating that the expression and the oncogenic activity of SOX2 is regulated by SRR2. Additionally, our xenograft models re vealed that the lack of SRR2 impairs tumor initiation and growth in vivo. Tumors derived from SRR2del cells were significantly smaller compared to controls and exhibit low levels of SOX2, Ki67 and BMI1 but high levels of p21CIP1 and p27KIP1.
Conclusion
Our data confirm that the SRR2 regulates SOX2 expression and reveal that SRR2 deletion reduces SOX2 levels and halts malignant activity driven by SOX2 in GB.
View on Web