Hearing recovery after surgical resection of non-vestibular schwannoma cerebellopontine angle tumors

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Hearing recovery after surgical resection of non-vestibular schwannoma cerebellopontine angle tumors Via Laryngologie Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06956-6. Online ahead of print. ABSTRACT PURPOSE: Post-operative outcomes for hearing after resection surgery to remove cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors other than vestibular schwannomas (VS) are not well understood. This study presents a series of patients with significant post-operative hearing recovery, trying to define the incidence among all patients operated on for removal of non-VS CPA tumors. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational case series of 8 patients among 69 operated on for removal of non-VS CPA tumors between 2012 and 2020. All patients had pre- and post-operative hearing measurement with pure-tone average (PTA) and speech discrimination score (SDS), according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recommendations, auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements and imaging. RESULTS: Six meningiomas and two lower cran ial nerve schwannomas operated on with a retrosigmoid approach were included for analysis. The mean pre-operative PTA and SDS were 58 ± 20.7 dB and 13 ± 17.5%, respectively. All patients had pre-operative class D hearing and asynchronous ABRs. They all showed significant hearing recovery, with an improvement of 36 ± 22.2 dB (p = 0.0025) and 85 ± 16.9% (p = 0.0001) in PTA and SDS, respectively, with mean follow-up of 21 ± 23.5 months. Seven patients recovered to a class A hearing level and one patient to class B. The ABRs became synchronous for three patients. The incidence of auditory recovery was 13% for patients operated on with a conservative approach (n = 60). CONCLUSION: A significant post-operative improvement in hearing could be a reasonable expectation in non-VS tumors extending into the CPA and a retrosigmoid approach should always be considered regardless of pre-operative hearing status. PMID:34175969 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-021-06956-6 View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.