Consensus of free flap complications: Using a nomenclature paradigm in microvascular head and neck reconstruction

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Consensus of free flap complications: Using a nomenclature paradigm in microvascular head and neck reconstruction Via Head & Neck Abstract Background We aim to define a set of terms for common free flap complications with evidence-based descriptions. Methods Clinical consensus surveys were conducted among a panel of head and neck/reconstructive surgeons (N = 11). A content validity index for relevancy and clarity for each item was computed and adjusted for chance agreement (modified kappa, K). Items with K < 0.74 for relevancy (i.e., ratings of "good" or "fair") were eliminated. Results Five out of nineteen terms scored K < 0.74. Eliminated terms included "vascular compromise"; "cellulitis"; "surgical site abscess"; "malocclusion"; and "non- or mal-union." Terms that achieved consensus were "total/partial free flap failure"; "free flap takeback"; "arterial thrombosis"; "venous thrombosis"; "revision of microvascular anastomosis"; "fistula"; "wound dehiscence"; "hematoma"; "seroma"; "partial skin graft failure"; "total skin graft failure"; "exposed hardware or bone"; and "hardware failure." Conclusion Standardized reporting would encourage multi-institutional research collaboration, larger scale quality improvement initiatives, the ability to set risk-adjusted benchmarks, and enhance education and communication. View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.