J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Apr 23:S1748-6815(21)00184-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.080. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Scalp wounds pose reconstructive challenges due to the lack of skin elasticity, potential for compromised adjacent tissue, and desire for the restoration of esthetic contour. Bilayer Wound Matrix (BWM) has been successfully employed as a treatment modality for complex, full-thickness wounds of the scalp. We aimed to highlight risk factors for BWM success and failure in complex wounds of the scalp.
METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed from 2012 to 2019 of adult subjects who presented to plastic or dermatological surgery with complex scalp defects with or without exposed calvarium, who underwent staged reconstruction with BWM and split-thickness skin grafting or secondary intention. Success was defined as complete wound re-epithelialization within 90-day follow-up withou t additional operative procedures for wound coverage. Demographics, comorbidities, treatment history, wound characteristics, and clinical course were analyzed and correlated with reconstructive outcomes.
RESULTS: In total, 127 subjects were identified for inclusion, with mean age 74.6 ± 12.2 years, defect area 80.2 ± 89.4 cm2, and wound age 10.0 ± 65.4 days. Successful wound reconstruction occurred in 107 (84%) subjects. Postoperative wound infections were an independent predictor of BWM failure at 90 days (Odds Ratio: 6.4, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.5 - 26.7, and p<0.012). Additionally, subjects who underwent preoperative radiation were more likely to suffer from reconstructive failure (p<0.040) as well as those who require postoperative inpatient admission (p<0.034).
CONCLUSION: BWM represents a reliable and efficacious modality in the treatment of complex scalp wounds. Patient comorbidities may not heavily influence the success of BWM to establi sh adequate wound coverage; however, preoperative radiation and postoperative wound infection may often lead to reconstructive failure.
PMID:34024741 | DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.080
No comments:
Post a Comment