Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 May 22:34894211018909. doi: 10.1177/00034894211018909. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess droplet splatter around the surgical field and surgeon during simulated Coblation tonsil surgery to better inform on mitigation strategies and evaluate choice of personal protective equipment.
METHODS: This was an observational study performed using a life-size head model to simulate tonsil surgery and fluorescein-soaked strawberri es to mimic tonsils. The Coblation wand was activated over the strawberries for 5 minutes. This was repeated 5 times with 2 surgeons (totalling 10 data sets). The presence of droplet around the surgical field and anatomical subsites on the surgeon was assessed in binary fashion: present or not present. The results were collated as frequency of droplet detection and illustrated as a heatmap; 0 = white, 1-2 = yellow, 3-4 = orange, and 5 = red.
RESULTS: Fluorescein droplets were detected in all 4 quadrants of the surgical field. The frequency of splatter was greatest in the upper (nearest to surgeon) and lower quadrants. There were detectable splatter droplets on the surgeon; most frequently occurring on the hands followed by the forearm. Droplets were also detected on the visor, neck, and chest albeit less frequently. However, none were detected on the upper arms.
CONCLUSION: Droplet splatter can be detected in the immediate surgical field as well as on the surgeon. Althou gh wearing a face visor does not prevent splatter on the surgical mask or around the eyes, it should be considered when undertaking tonsil surgery as well as a properly fitted goggle.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.
PMID:34027704 | DOI:10.1177/00034894211018909
No comments:
Post a Comment