[Evaluation of chitosan-based nasal dressing in animal model].

[Evaluation of chitosan-based nasal dressing in animal model].

Orv Hetil. 2018 Nov;159(47):1981-1987

Authors: Piski Z, Gerlinger I, Tóth E, Háromi I, Nepp N, Lujber L

Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The usefulness of nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery is still debated in the literature.
AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the effects of a new chitosan-based nasal dressing in animal model.
METHODS: Standard mucosal damage was caused in both nostrils during endoscope-assisted procedure in ten rabbits. Chitosan nasal packing was inserted in a randomly selected nasal fossa of each animal, while the other side was left unpacked. Symptoms were evaluated during nasal endoscopy on the 12th postoperative week. The degree of mucosal oedema, crusting, adhesions and the nasal discharge were observed according to the modification of the grading system of Berlucchi et al. The higher scores indicated the worse complaints.
RESULTS: Assessing the adhesion formation, 1 point was given (mean: 0.1; standard deviation [SD]: 0.32) for the unpacked side, while in the tamponated side no adhesion formation was observed. The total score of crusting in the non-packed side was lower with 1 point (total score: 9, mean: 0.90; SD: 0.74) than in the chitosan side (total score: 10, mean 1.00; SD: 0.82). Discharge or mucosal oedema were not observed during the follow-up period. The mean rate, measured with electronmicroscopy, was 22.06% (SD: 0.25) in the chitosan side, while in the non-packed side it was 36.11% (SD: 0.48). The differences did not show any significance (p = 0.806).
CONCLUSION: During the examinations, none of the animals suffered complications. The symptoms of the packed and the non-packed nasal cavities did not differ significantly on the basis of our examinations. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(47): 1981-1987.

PMID: 30474381 [PubMed - in process]

from PubMed via alexandrossfakianakis on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2SgyT3j