Blog Archive

Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης

Tuesday, August 10, 2021

Presentation and management of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leaks after sphenoclival expanded endonasal surgery: A single institution experience

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Sep;91:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.06.036. Epub 2021 Jun 27.

ABSTRACT

While surgical approaches and techniques of expanded endonasal approach (EEA) surgery have been well described, little data exist regarding management of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. In this study, we examined a surgeon's continuous 12-year experience with failed closure of sphenoclival skull base defects. We conducted a retrospective case series of patients identified with post-operative CSF leaks after EEA of the sphenoclival axis, managed by a single otolaryngologist at a minimally invasive skull base center. Ten out of 326 patients required therapeutic intervention for central skull base defect closure failure. Median time to presentation of CSF leak was 25 days (range 6-542 days). Symptoms included rhinorrhea (n = 7), meningitis (n = 6), and pneumocephalus (n = 1). The majority of patients (7 of 10) were first managed by lum bar drain placement - one of which had resolution of his/her CSF leak. Overall, 9 of 10 patients required endoscopic repair. The majority of the post-operative CSF leaks (9/13, 69.2%) were repaired using a vascularized mucosal flap. There were 3 patients who required a second revision surgery. All CSF leaks were repaired without completely deconstructing the initial repair. Failure sites most frequently occurred outside of the sella (80%), likely reflecting their direct relationship to the intracranial cisterns. Initial operative repair provided definitive treatment in most cases (70%). Correct placement of a vascularized local pedicle-based flap is essential for successful repair. Knowledge of alternative flaps is particularly important when the nasoseptal flap is no longer available.

PMID:34373017 | DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2021.06.036

View on the web

No comments:

Post a Comment