Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02794-7. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Correct localization of the sacral hiatus is essential for administering a successful caudal epidural block. The purpose of this study is to create a statistical model of sacral hiatus from dorsal sacral parameters to improve the location of the hiatus and thus, reduce the failure rate. The aim of this investigation was to examine the relationship of sacral hiatus morpholo gy and dimension with sacral curvature. This study further examines the dorsal sacral parameters that could affect the sacral hiatus dimension.
METHODS: Adult, human, dry sacra and three-dimensionally reconstructed sacra from computed tomography imaging of normal subjects were included in the study and measured using digital Vernier calipers of 0.01 mm accuracy and Geomagic freeform plus software, respectively.
RESULT: The most frequent shape of the sacral hiatus was an inverted V (48%) followed by inverted U shape (32%), an irregular shape (12.3%), an M shape (4.7) and an A shape (2.8%). The data were represented by mean and standard deviation. Sacra with M-shaped hiatus had the lowest hiatal length (14.21 ± 5.44 mm), whereas sacra with an inverted V-shaped hiatus had the highest length (25.41 ± 11.3 mm). The anteroposterior diameter of the sacral hiatus at the base in males and females was found to be 3.46 ± 1.48 mm and 2.79 ± 0.83 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). The distance between the caudal end of the median sacral crest and the apex of the sacral hiatus (7.90 ± 6.74 mm, 4.4 ± 5.86 mm) also revealed sexual dimorphism (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The correlations between most of the dorsal sacral parameters and length of the sacral hiatus are significant. The intercornual distance is also moderately correlated with the distance between right and left lateral sacral crest S1 level. Dorsal sacral parameters predicts variance of the sacral hiatus dimension from 40 to 73% and this could be utilized for statistical model of the sacral hiatus.
PMID:34216248 | DOI:10.1007/s00276-021-02794-7
No comments:
Post a Comment