Blog Archive

Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης

Sunday, June 27, 2021

Definition and illustration of the different types of nasal cycle using long-term rhinometry

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
Via hno

pubmed-meta-image.png

HNO. 2021 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00106-021-01078-1. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A reciprocal swelling of the nasal mucosa is often referred to as the classical nasal cycle; however, reports in the literature suggest a more complex picture. Most of the research on the nasal cycle is based on individual measurements. The long-term rhinometry (LRM) now makes it possible to continuously examine the cyclic swelling of the nasal mucosa over 24 h. The aim of this stu dy was therefore to evaluate the nasal cycle with LRM over 24 h.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: An LRM was performed in 55 rhinologically healthy subjects over 24 h using the portable measuring system Rhino-Move© (Happersberger Otopront; Hohenstein, Germany).

RESULTS: In addition to the expected strictly reciprocal swelling of the nasal mucosa in the sense of the classical nasal cycle, the following cycle types were detected: in-concert type with simultaneous rise and drop of the air flow on both sides of the nose, the one-sided type with significant congestion and decongestion of the mucous membrane only on one side and no detectable changes on the other side of the nose and the non-cycle type without any change in airflow on both sides. Most subjects showed a complex picture with multiple cycle types within the 24 h measurement (mixed nasal cycle). The types often differed during the day and night.

CONCLUSION: This study confirms the assumption that the nasal cycle measu red over 24 h is much more complex than often described in the literature. Most subjects showed several of the 5 cycle types described here. The LRM has proven to be an easy to- use and reliable measurement method. The relationship between cycle type and physical activity as well as other factors remains to be investigated.

PMID:34170336 | DOI:10.1007/s00106-021-01078-1

View on the web

No comments:

Post a Comment