Comparison of robotic‐assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of single compartment knee osteoarthritis: A meta‐analysis

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Comparison of robotic‐assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of single compartment knee osteoarthritis: A meta‐analysis Via The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery Abstract Background The robotic‐assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is proposed to improve the accuracy of component positioning. Methods We conducted a literature search in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library until April 2020. Results Our meta‐analysis included 10 articles, involving 1231 knees. Our meta‐analysis demonstrated that the robotic group had significantly better results in outliers of limb alignment (p < 0.001) and outliers of tibial alignment (p < 0.001). No statistical differences were found in the American Knee Society Score (p = 0.63), range of motion (p = 0.93), pain (p = 0.27), rate of revisions (p = 0.73) and rate of complications (p = 0.67). Conclusions Robotic‐assisted UKA has better component position accuracy compared with conventional UKA. But there was no significant difference in clinical results. In order to further evaluate the utility of robotic‐assisted UKA, long‐term follow‐up randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed, as well as studies to evaluate the correlation between postoperative alignment and long‐term clinical results. View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.