Blog Archive

Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης

Monday, December 28, 2020

Emergency Medicine

A European Emergency Medicine Research Network: a necessity achieved
No abstract available

A brief history of point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography in the USA
No abstract available

Adding barriers to barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for interdisciplinary research on communication with migrant patients in the emergency department
No abstract available

The ineffable epinephrine in the labyrinth of evidence-based medicine
No abstract available

Is good mentorship found on Twitter? We think so
No abstract available

Effect of oxygen supply on mortality in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis
imagePrevious studies stated that high oxygen supply in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) was not associated with improved outcomes. However, the particularities of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and the results of a recent trial raised the question if this subgroup of patients benefits from high oxygen supply. This study aims to evaluate the clinical effect of high oxygen supply in patients with STEMI using a systematic review of the available literature. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the systematic use of high oxygen (6 L/min or higher) versus room air or lower oxygen supply in STEMI patients were included. Systematic review with meta-analysis of trials retrieved in July 2020. Six databases were searched. The confidence in the pooled estimates was ascertained through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. There were five eligible RCTs (7703 patients). High oxygen supply was associated with a significant risk reduction of short-term mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–0.98; I2 = 0%]. Mortality (longest follow-up) (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.97; I2 = 0%) and heart failure (RR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60–1.18; I2 = 0%) did not present a risk reduction. Recurrent MI presented a contradictory result, favouring the lower oxygen protocol (RR 1.47; 95% CI, 0.84–2.56; I2 = 0%). The GRADE analysis was very low. High oxygen supply may be associated with a decrease in short-term mortality in STEMI patients, but the pooled data are not robust enough to allow definitive conclusions.

Quality of dispatcher-assisted vs. automated external defibrillator-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised simulation trial
imageBackground Quality of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an important determinant of resuscitation outcome for cardiac arrest patients cared for by lay rescuers. We designed a simulation trial to assess and compare the quality of CPR among untrained lay people under two different scenarios: automated external defibrillator (AED)-guided and dispatcher-assisted CPR. Patients and methods A simulation study was performed involving 42 volunteers selected by non-probabilistic sampling. Participants were randomized into two CPR simulation scenarios with a manikin: (A) AED-guided CPR and (T) dispatcher-assisted CPR. The quality of CPR was evaluated by metric monitoring of the chest compressions and timing of actions. Content analysis of the telephone instructions was performed by two independent researchers using a checklist. Results CPR was started in 20 of the 21 cases in scenario A and in all cases in scenario T. In total, 12 053 chest compressions were applied, 57.6% corresponding to scenario A. The proportion of compressions that were of an adequate depth was low in both cases, 15.3% in scenario A vs. 31.7% in scenario T (P < 0.001), while complete chest recoil was allowed in 66 and 72% (P < 0.001) of compressions, respectively. The AED advised to shock 91 times, and shocks were delivered in all cases. Conclusions Although guided CPR helps untrained people to initiate resuscitation manoeuvres, the quality of CPR was poor in both groups. Telephone guidance improved the proportion of compressions that achieved adequate chest compression and recoil but did not optimise the compression rate.

Agreement between emergency physicians and radiologists for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis with compression ultrasound: a prospective study
imageIntroduction The time factor in diagnosis and management of a deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities (LE DVT) is of increasing importance in the era of crowding of emergency departments (ED). Current techniques used to detect LE DVT include a two-point regional compression ultrasound (rCUS), yet assessments are usually performed only during office hours. Outside office hours ultrasonography is postponed and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prescribed. Objectives Primary outcome of the study was to assess the level of agreement in rCUS for LE DVT when performed by Dutch emergency physicians compared to rCUS by a radiologist. Secondary outcome was time to diagnosis. Method We performed a single-blind cohort study. All consecutive patients aged 18 years and older attending the ED with clinical suspicion of LE DVT were considered eligible for study enrolment. rCUS was ordered at the radiology department; subsequently, the bedside rCUS examination was also performed in the ED by the emergency physicians or ED residents. Results A total of 138 patients were included, of whom 28 patients were diagnosed with DVT by a radiologist. Emergency physicians and radiologists showed comparable agreement [absolute agreement 94% (P < 0.001), Cohen's Kappa 0.87]. Emergency physicians decreased overall time to diagnosis by 01:04 h, ED residents showed comparable results. During out-of-office hours, time benefit was 16:39 h on weekdays and 18:40 h during weekends. Conclusion Emergency physicians show comparable agreement in diagnosing LE DVT using rCUS when compared to radiologists. Average time benefit is over an hour, thereby reducing unnecessary waiting and improving time to disposition. ED residents demonstrated similar results in both agreement and time-saving.

Effect of chest ultrasound on diagnostic workup in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure in the emergency department: a prospective study
imageMethods We carried out a prospective study performed in our ED, included patients older than 75 years presenting with acute respiratory failure. Noninclusion criteria were documented palliative care or the need for immediate intensive care. After informed consent approval and routine diagnostic procedure (clinical, radiological and laboratory tests), the ED physician established the first diagnosis. Chest ultrasound was then performed, and a second diagnosis was established. An adjudication committee also established a diagnosis. The unweighted Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient was used to measure the strength of agreement between routine diagnostic approach, chest ultrasound and adjudication committee diagnosis. Results A total of 89 patients were included, mean age 86 ± 5 years old. Concordance was very good (κ = 0.82) between chest ultrasound and adjudication committee diagnostic and moderate (κ = 0.52) between routine diagnostic approach and adjudication committee diagnostic. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema and community-acquired pneumonia were the most frequent diagnoses (48.5 and 27%, respectively). Chest ultrasound had higher sensitivity and specificity for both diagnoses. Conclusion In our study, chest ultrasound add-on investigation to standard approach improved diagnosis performance in elderly patients presenting to the ED with acute respiratory failure. Further multicenter randomized trials are warranted to confirm this finding. Diagnostic assessment of acute respiratory failure in elderly patients is often challenging, and initial misdiagnosis is associated with poorer outcomes. Chest ultrasound could help to improve diagnostic performance in this population. The objective of our study was to assess chest ultrasound (i.e. combined cardiac and lung ultrasound) add-on investigation to standard diagnosis approach in elderly patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute respiratory failure.

Association between collapse and serum creatinine and electrolyte concentrations in marathon runners: a 9-year retrospective study
imageObjective Abnormal biochemical measurements have previously been described in runners following marathons. The incidence of plasma sodium levels outside the normal range has been reported as 31%, and the incidence of raised creatinine at 30%. This study describes the changes seen in electrolytes and creatinine in collapsed (2010–2019 events) and noncollapsed (during the 2019 event) runners during a UK marathon. Methods Point-of-care sodium, potassium, urea and creatinine estimates were obtained from any collapsed runner treated by the medical team during the Brighton Marathons, as part of their clinical care, and laboratory measurements from control subjects. Results Results from 224 collapsed runners were available. Serum creatinine was greater than the normal range in 68.9%. About 6% of sodium results were below, and 3% above the normal range, with the lowest 132 mmol/l. Seventeen percent of potassium readings were above the normal range; the maximum result was 8.4 mmol/l, but 97% were below 6.0 mmol/l. In the control group, mean creatinine was significantly raised in both the collapse and control groups, with 55.4% meeting the criteria for acute kidney injury, but had resolved to baseline after 24 h. Sodium concentration but not the potassium was significantly raised after the race compared with baseline, but only 15% were outside the normal range. Conclusion In this study, incidence of a raised creatinine was higher than previously reported. However, the significance of such a rise remains unclear with a similar rise seen in collapsed and noncollapsed runners, and resolution noted within 24 h. Abnormal sodium concentrations were observed infrequently, and severely abnormal results were not seen, potentially reflecting current advice to drink enough fluid to quench thirst.


#
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,
Telephone consultation 11855 int 1193,

No comments:

Post a Comment