Blog Archive

Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης

Sunday, December 6, 2020

Clinical and histological comparison of the soft tissue morphology between zirconia and titanium dental implants under healthy and experimental mucositis conditions - A randomized controlled clinical trial.

p.aythelady61 shared this article with you from Inoreader
Related Articles

Clinical and histological comparison of the soft tissue morphology between zirconia and titanium dental implants under healthy and experimental mucositis conditions - A randomized controlled clinical trial.

J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Dec 05;:

Authors: Bienz SP, Hilbe M, Hüsler J, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE

Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the soft tissue morphology under healthy and experimental mucositis conditions comparing zirconia and titanium implants.
METHODS: Forty-two patients with two adjacent missing teeth received one zirconia (Zr) and one titanium (Ti) implant, with the mesial and distal position randomized. At 3 months, half of the patients were instructed to continue (healthy; h) and the other half to omit (experimental mucositis; m) oral hygiene around the implants for 3 weeks. Clinical parameters were evaluated before and after the experimental phase and a soft tissue biopsy was harvested. Mixed model analyses were performed to analyze the data.
RESULTS: The plaque control record increased significantly for the two mucositis groups, reaching 68.3±31.9% (mean±standard deviation) for Zr-m and 75.0±29.4% for Ti-m (p<0.0001), being also significantly lower for Zr-m than for Ti-m. Bleeding on probing remained stable in group Zr-m and amounted to 21.7±23.6%, but increased significantly in group Ti-m (p=0.040), measuring 32.5±27.8%. The number of inflammatory cells and the length of the junctional epithelium did not significantly differ between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Both implants rendered similar outcomes under healthy conditions. Lower plaque and bleeding scores were detected for zirconia implants under experimental mucositis conditions. Histologically, only minimal differences were observed.

PMID: 33278048 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

View on the web

No comments:

Post a Comment